Ycannabis
.com.au

Youth cannabis literacy

Clarity, context and youth perspective on cannabis in Australia.

Ycannabis.com.au explains cannabis news, education, policy, advocacy and research for young Australians. We do not sell anything, campaign for anything, or tell you what to think — we set out what the evidence and the legislation actually say.

Independent · Non-commercial · Evidence-based · Published in Australia

The picture in numbers

What the national data shows

Figures below are from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare’s National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2022–2023, the most recent national survey of its kind. They describe patterns; they do not imply a recommendation in any direction.

25.5%

People aged 18–24 who used cannabis in the previous 12 months

The highest rate of any age group. Essentially unchanged from 25% in the 2019 survey, so the often-repeated claim of a sharp recent rise among young adults is not supported by this measure.

AIHW NDSHS 2022–23
41%

People aged 14 and over who have used cannabis at least once

Up from 36% in 2019 and the highest figure since the survey series began in 2001. Lifetime use counts a single occasion decades ago the same as regular use, so it measures exposure across a population, not current behaviour.

AIHW NDSHS 2022–23
80%

Australians who said possession should not be a criminal offence

A separate question found 45% supported legalisation — the first time support for legalisation outweighed support for increased penalties (39%). Removing a criminal penalty and legalising a market are different policy questions, and the survey treats them separately.

AIHW NDSHS 2022–23
How to read these figures

Household surveys rely on self-reporting, so they under-count behaviour people are reluctant to disclose. They also exclude people not living in private dwellings. They are the best national picture available, and they are still an estimate with a margin around it. Where a number matters to an argument, we link to the source so you can check the definition yourself.

Our approach

Five rules we hold ourselves to

Cannabis is one of the few topics where young people are talked about constantly and talked to rarely. The material aimed at them tends to be either a warning or a pitch. We are trying to occupy the space in between: information good enough to reason with.

We separate what is known from what is argued

A finding from a study, a provision in an Act, and a position held by an organisation are three different kinds of claim. We label which one you are reading, every time. Where the evidence is genuinely contested, we say so rather than picking the tidier answer.

We name the source and the date

Every figure carries its source and the year it was collected. Cannabis data ages quickly and legislation more quickly still, so an undated statistic is close to useless.

We do not campaign

We are not aligned with any political party, reform organisation, prohibitionist group or commercial interest. When we describe a policy argument we describe the strongest version of each side, including the side we expect our readers to disagree with.

We write for a reader, not a risk profile

Young people are treated here as capable of handling accurate information about a complex subject. That means no scare framing, and equally no downplaying of findings that are inconvenient to a reform narrative.

We correct the record in public

When we get something wrong we fix it, note what changed, and date the change. Our corrections policy sets out how.

Where to next

Three good places to start

Policy & Law

How the law differs by state and territory

Eight jurisdictions, eight different answers, plus a layer of Commonwealth law sitting over the top. A structural comparison, without the myths.

Explainer

Education

The glossary

Decriminalisation, legalisation, diversion, expiation, harm minimisation. Terms that get used interchangeably in public debate but mean quite different things.

Reference